How Sex-Trafficking Survivors Are Locked Out of Victim Funds

Deborah Pembrook doesnt remember exactly when she was first sex-trafficked, but she knows it was earlythe images of abuse collide in her brain with images of childhood crayons and stuffed animals. When she finally escaped, she was 17 years old and all alone. Her earnings had gone to her trafficker, so she had no savings, and she was forced to move to another state, so she had no family or safety net. And because of the laws in Californiathe state where she eventually settled, to disappear among tourists on the crowded beaches of Santa Cruzshe had no way of getting what she really needed: cash.

Throughout the United States, thousands of human-trafficking survivors are struggling to make up for the wages stolen from them while they were enslaved. But unlike victims of other violent crimessay, a mugging victim who cant work because of their injuries, or a robbery victim who cant work because of a stolen computertrafficking victims are routinely barred from recouping lost income through state victim compensation funds.

Now, lawmakers in California are trying to change that. A new bill would secure the right of sex- and labor-trafficking victims to recover lost income through the states victim compensation funda decades-old institution that provides reimbursement for crime-related expenses like medical care, mental health services, funeral expenses, relocation, and lost income. In the last year, it paid out more than $57 million dollars to victims of violent crimes.

Trafficking victims arent explicitly locked out of the fundin fact, many have received compensation for expenses like mental health services or relocation. But when it comes to paying back lost income, the devil is in the details: Under current state guidelines, any crime victims seeking reimbursement for lost income must submit a workers compensation report or a letter from their employer. In a trafficking case, thats the same person who exploited the victim.

Why He Disappeared - By Evan Marc Katz

Learn The Real Reason A Man Suddenly Disappears From Your Life, And What You Can Do To Stop It From Happening Again. The Author, Evan Marc Katz, Is Known As A "personal Trainer For Love" And The #1 Dating Coach For Smart, Strong, Successful Women.

Common sense tells you no trafficking victims could ask their employer for a letter documenting their trafficking, said Stephanie Richard, a senior policy adviser for the nonprofit Coalition to Abolish Slavery and Trafficking (CAST). Therefore if the victims compensation fund wishes to fully compensate all victims, they need to come up with a different system.

The problem isnt unique to California. A Daily Beast analysis of publicly available documents found that the majority of states require pay stubs, tax filings, or confirmation from an employer to apply for lost incomeall documents that a trafficking victim would not be able to access. No states have statutes affirming that trafficking victims are entitled to lost income.

Richard first started working on a solution in 2015, when she realized that none of her organizations nearly 300 clients would be able to access lost income through the California fund. At first, Richard and representatives from Bet Tzedeka nonprofit providing legal services to low-income communitiestried working directly with the California Victim Compensation Board. But after nearly two years, the board said it didnt have the regulatory authority need to make such a substantial change. They would have to go to the legislature.

The bill that CAST, Bet Tzedek, and Assemblymember Lorena Gonzalez drafted in 2017 added language directly to state statutes affirming a trafficking victims right to lost income. It also set up a simple calculation for determining lost wages40 hours a week at minimum wage, for as long as the person said they were traffickedand capped payouts at $20,000. And it directed the state compensation board to determine what kind of proof was needed to establish the length of the trafficking, whether through police reports, advocate statements, or victim testimony.

In 2018, the bill passed the California legislature unanimously. Supporters included the California District Attorneys Association, the California College and University Police Chiefs Association, and the California Narcotic Officers Association.

But at the last minute, then-Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed it. In a statement, his office claimed the plan would fundamentally change the nature of the Board's system for compensating victims and would place an unsustainable burden on the Restitution Fund.

The advocates were stunned.

We felt like the policy arguments were there, Richard said. Governor Brown had signed numerous pieces of anti trafficking legislation that year, and it felt like he hadnt signed the most important one for survivors.

When the legislature founded it in 1965, the California Victim Compensation Fund was the first in the country. Along with money for victims, the fund paid out damages to so-called good Samaritans who were injured while trying to prevent crimes, and to California residents who were victimized in or out of state. In 2017, the fund paid more than $3 million to California-based victims of Harvest Festival shooting in Las Vegas. It also paid more than $11 million for funeral and burial expenses statewide, and $18 million to support victims mental health.

Supporters of the bill, known as AB 629, know that reimbursing trafficking victims for lost income would require a conceptual shift. Unlike a mugging victim with a broken arm, a trafficking victims request would stem from income lost during the commission of the crime, not afterward. But advocates say that it is the government that is fundamentally changing the nature of the fundnot themby effectively excluding trafficking survivors from full benefits.

As long as we have a fund right now that purports to fund victims of crime, in my view theres no reason why victims of [human trafficking] should be isolated and shunned from this group, said Claire Lipschultz of the National Council of Jewish Women, which is supporting the bill. If we have a structural system in place that California has identified as important, to not include this survivors just seems discriminatory."

When Pembrook first escaped her trafficker, she worked days at the boardwalk and nights as a janitor to afford a place to live. But she knows that the days of findings a $200-a-month apartment in Southern Californiaeven a seedy one, like the places she stayedare over. Today, as a counselor to other trafficking survivors at the Monterey County Rape Crisis Center she believes money from the victims compensation fund could help her clients pay for housing, education, or whatever else they need to feel safe.

Existing programs for trafficking survivors, she said, are often very rule-intensive and they dont give survivors choices.

What made me feel safe when I was exiting was having choice, she added.

Other states have also tried to make it easier for trafficking survivors to access funds in recent years. In New York, lawmakers expanded the amount of time child sex abuse survivors are given to file civil cases and potentially win settlements. According to Mother Jones, hundreds of lawsuits hit state courts in the wake of the change, naming abusers like the Catholic Church, the Boy Scouts, and financier Jeffrey Epstein.

But Matthew DeCarolis, a staff attorney for Bet Tzedek, noted that most human traffickers arent well-known multimillionaires like Jeffrey Epstein. Most are harder to pin down becauseby the very nature of their enterprisethey move frequently, and purposefully hide their assets. Others may already be in prison, or otherwise financially insolvent, and thus unable to earn money to pay back judgements.

Victims can also access compensation through the criminal court system, DeCarolis said, but that would still require tracking the perpetrator down and forcing victims to relive their trauma through lengthy court proceedings.

The [Victim Compensation Fund] is and always will be a payer of last resort, DeCarolis said. But the fact of the matter is, for a lot of trafficking survivors, there are no other options.

As to whether the California fund can afford this change, that remains to be seen. The fund has always run a surplus; in 2008, the state borrowed $80 million from its coffers, according to a budgeting spreadsheet provided by CAST. But because of recent criminal justice reforms, the fines and fees from which the fund draws its revenue are decreasing. Both sides agree it may have trouble sustaining itself in the future.

But Richard says thats no excuse for locking survivors out of their money.

We are not questioning that in the long run the fund will have to be replenished and have different courses of funding, Richardson said, but we question the governors stance that it should be done on the backs of trafficking victims.

According to CASTs latest projections, passing AB 629 would cost the fund less than $300,000 a year. Currently, fewer than 200 victims apply for funding annually, and less than half actually receive a payout. Even if each victim applied for a full year of lost incomeunlikely, because CAST says the majority of their clients were enslaved for six months or lessthe total cost to the fund would be $256,000 a year. Currently, the fund pays about $11 million dollars annually in lost income to victims of other crimes.

This year, after the election of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Assemblywoman Christy Smith reintroduced the legislationthis time with the coveted support of the state Womens Caucus. Last week, the bill once again passed the legislature unanimously. Now, the final hurdle is seeing whether the legislation can get the governors signature.

Smith told The Daily Beast she is hopeful that Newsom will sign the bill, adding that it would help support reintegration into society. But for advocates like Richard and DeCarolis, its also a way for society to show a little faith in their clients.

Not that any amount of money can compensate anyone for any type of exploitation theyve been through, but [this is] at least some very tangible recognition that their case is taken seriously, even if the trafficker is never prosecuted or tracked down, DeCarolis said.

Added Richard, This allows people to get a little bit of justice from the system.

Original Article : HERE ; The Ultimate Survival Food: The Lost Ways

The best offers on the market today:

Get 250+ Daily Website Visitors On Complete Autopilot in ANY Niche with 100% Real FREE Traffic
Carl Henry Online Success We Are Focused On Affiliate Partner Success
Reservations Software.
How To Make Money Teaching Guitar.
Lawn Care Magic ~ Grow Your Lawn 3 Times Faster!

Enthusiastic Blogger

Extreme web junkie. Proud food advocate. Friendly tv buff. Travel ninja. Professional introvert.

Leave a Reply